|
Ongoing H3 arc heater developmental testing hits
major milestone, sets record
Blackanthem
Military News, ARNOLD AIR FORCE BASE, Tenn., April 18, 2006
13:01
|
 |
|
H3 Arc heater being test fired prior to the installation of the model
injection system. (Air Force photo) |
Arnold Engineering Development
Center reached a significant milestone recently while conducting a series
of independent tests on the H3 arc heater and a multiple model positioning
system to expand the facility operating envelope and validate a major arc
heater system upgrade.
At the end of a series of recent runs of the H3 arc heater under a
technology development program, Aerospace Testing Alliance's (ATA) reentry
materials testing group and supporting team members succeeded in getting
the large arc heater facility up to 167 atmospheres, setting a new world
record and keeping with their validation goals.
"This is further proof of what this system will be able to accomplish for
our customers," said Mark Smith, the project engineer in ATA's reentry
materials testing group. "Validation like this will ultimately lead to our
ability to use H3 to conduct increasingly accurate aerothermal testing in
support of mission critical work, including operational testing for the
Naval Surface Warfare Center's Reentry Systems Applications Program and
the Air Force's Reentry Vehicle Applications Program."
The H3 arc heater, which has a larger flow field than the H1 heater - is
used to subject material samples of missile nose tips, reentry vehicles
and structures to the severe environment encountered during hypersonic
flight or reentry from high altitudes and space. The objective of this
testing is to cause ablation, which is a burning away of the protective
covering of a missile nose tip or the leading edge of a spacecraft,
hypersonic aircraft or reentry vehicle.
Ablation is a normal, expected re-entry phenomenon, and the use of an
ablative heat shield is often the only way to protect a vehicle during
reentry. Because energy is absorbed as the heat shield surface is
vaporized, energy, which would have been absorbed by the craft is absorbed
in the ablation process. The objective of operational arc heater testing
is to find materials that will burn evenly and slowly enough for a missile
to successfully intercept a target or to allow a space vehicle or other
structures to survive hypersonic flight or atmospheric re-entry.
"The ongoing work on the H3 heater could be described as high-pressure arc
heater developmental testing," explained Dr. Joseph Sheeley, ATA
facilities technology engineer. "The idea is to expand the operating
envelope of the H3 arc heater from its current capacity to simulate higher
surface pressures and heating rates. It's a continuing process because as
materials get better and technologies get better, missiles and spacecraft
are going to come in on a steeper reentry trajectory - coming in faster
and hotter - so, you're going to need increased (testing and flight
simulation) capabilities."
AEDC's engineers reproduce ablative conditions in a two-stage process. The
arc heaters use a high voltage, electric arc discharge to heat air to
temperatures up to 13,000 degrees Rankine (thermodynamic temperature
scale). High-pressure test flows are achieved by confining the electrical
arc discharge in a water-cooled channel capable of withstanding high
chamber pressures.
Prior to the current round of developmental tests, it was possible to get
the arc heater chamber pressures up to 120 atmospheres reliably. The
success of the current phase of H3 improvements will validate further
military contract (MILCON) investments necessary to meet higher demands
placed on the High Temperature Laboratory's power supply, provide the
needed air pressure overhead and flow rate, and the infrastructure
required for cooling H-3's components.
For development, a novel configuration is used where the H3 facility's
core is comprised of a 10-module heater, which is 80 inches long with a
smaller nozzle. This configuration allows the heater to be run at higher
pressures than is currently possible with the standard configuration by
keeping conditions within existing utility limits.
Each upstream module is made up of 18 copper segments, while downstream
modules are made up of 24 thinner segments. Modules can be added or
removed to vary the heater's operating characteristics, and a large part
of the development is the determination of a configuration in which the
heater will operate reliably.
The large arc heater is operating in a modified configuration, which is
dictated by the current limits of power and cooling capabilities, but
should allow testing to be conducted up to 150 atmospheres reliably,
according to Smith, who is also in charge of the customer requirements for
model positioning checkouts.
"We're now in the mode of trying to ultimately expand that demonstrated
pressure range up to the 200-250 atmosphere range, which simulates
conditions more realistic to flight," he explained. "These are all
demonstration runs to validate that H3 can handle the expanded test
envelope."
The team conducting the testing on H3 has faced an array of challenges.
Operating a higher pressure arc heater results in more accurate and useful
test data, but the fielding of such a capability is difficult.
"One big issue we face is arcing to the walls," Sheeley said. "The arc
heater becomes more unstable as you push up the pressure because the
resistance of the air column inside the heater goes up, along with heater
voltage and power. As those go up, the internal environment becomes more
unstable - the arc starts wandering inside the heater. It can warm the
wall which in turn reduces the electrical resistance between the gas and
the wall, initiating a destructive cycle that can eventually result in the
arc entering the wall causing severe damage to the heater. We try to keep
the arc in the center of the heater."
Maintaining higher pressures and temperatures inside the arc heater also
presents the dual challenge of ensuring segment walls are thick and strong
enough to withstand these extreme forces while simultaneously being thin
enough to allow rapid cooling to prevent overheating and destructive
arcing.
Earlier arc heater developmental testing initially employed a simple model
positioning system to evaluate the test environment. H3 uses a new
multiple model positioning system.
"I think we had four or five test runs with the single model positioning
system," Smith said. "Basically, H3 had been secured for a year and a half
while the investment group's been installing and checking out this new
model positioning system. They're about 90 percent done with the check
outs."
The next challenge involves designing the nozzle which directs the high
temperature and highly pressurized air onto the test article attached to
the model positioning system. The nozzle has to withstand the extremes in
temperature and pressure long enough to collect data, sufficient in
quantity and quality, to meet the objectives for a test or series of runs.
In January, one test run was successfully conducted on three Navy test
articles using the current arc heater configuration with the new model
positioning system.
Jeff Stewart, a project engineer for the arc technology program, put the
large arc heater's considerable capabilities into perspective - in terms
anyone might appreciate.
"I called the Tullahoma Utilities Board recently and found that at any
point in time their average power consumption is 35 megawatts as compared
to the 70 megawatts required by this arc heater," he said. "Tullahoma's
average water usage is about 1,700 gallons a minute; we're running about
3,100 gallons a minute - just through this arc heater alone.
By Philip Lorenz III
Arnold Engineering Development Center Public Affairs
|